|
|
Wednesday, February 7th, 2007
|
|
|
*incredulous look*
*laughter*
Hey, guys! Look at this! I'd almost forgotten about the Queen of Dogma's journal. Oh man... the old entries! And the icon!
I almost, almost think it could be fun to resurrect this journal.
|
|
Comments: Read 4 or Add Your Own.
|
|
Saturday, September 6th, 2003
|
|
Thursday, September 4th, 2003
|
|
|
This is the Queen of Dogma's secretary, ![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif) violetvale. I have infiltrated her journal. This is a very dangerous thing to do; if she learns of what I have done, I will surely be executed in a most horrible fashion.
My reason for this infiltration is to ask one question:
Should I assasinate the Queen?
|
|
Comments: Read 8 or Add Your Own.
|
|
Saturday, February 15th, 2003
|
|
|
Of all the holidays in the year, Valentine's Day is undoubtedly the silliest. Christmas I can tolerate, but this is simply too much. All this nonsense about crimson roses, chocolates, and hearts. Well, chocolates are permissible, but the rest is ridiculous.
Valentine's Day produces some of the most atrocious excuses for poetry, for many unlucky men feel compelled to pen sappy verses for their sweethearts. My opinion is that they would be much better off sticking to plain, prosaic speech. It is equally disgusting to fall back on the literary creations of authors (such as Tennyson and Shakespeare) to express one's love. If you cannot use your brains to come up with an honest, original sentiment, you would be better off saying nothing at all.
The world has enough trinkets and useless items in it without the infernal nuisance of Valentine stuffed animals--especially little red bears. Girls do not want to marry stuffed animals; they want to marry men. It would do well for the unfortunate swains of this era to take note of this.
To my great satisfaction, Valentine's Day is over for another year. The only reason I allow such a holiday to exist is because it keeps the populace happy. Not that I am afraid of a revolt--indeed, no!--but I don't wish to be bothered by such rabble.
In other news, I am considering bestowing honors upon certain blessed individuals. I am sure that you all wish to join the Queen's court. Applications of some sort will be procured in the future.
|
|
Comments: Read 16 or Add Your Own.
|
|
Saturday, January 11th, 2003
|
|
|
Chortle: Generally reserved for gentleman of a portly stature, in possession of facial hair, and of any age. It is considered unladylike for a female to chortle, but it is permissible among exceedingly young girls, usually ages two and under.
Chuckle: Men over the age of 35 are allowed to chuckle. Women are positively forbidden to chuckle.
Giggle: Females of any age may giggle, but under no circumstances may any male personage over the age of eight do so.
Guffaw: Restricted almost entirely to males between the ages of 15 and 35. Often reveals a lack of intelligence.
Hee-haw: Vulgar and boorish under any circumstances.
Snicker: Snickering is universal; male and female, young and old, rich and poor. It is also somewhat impolite.
Sniggle: A combinatioin of a snicker and a giggle, mainly employed by very silly teenage girls.
Tee hee: Generally an apologetic, embarrassed, or sheepish laugh. Commonly used by girls and unmanly boys.
Titter: Often found in books and movies set in other time periods (e.g., Jane Austen novels). Allowable only in foolish females in the presence of a male.
Cachinnate: Again, a universal laugh transcending all cultural, political, or sociological differences.
Cackle: Usually characteristic of skinny females over the age of 50. Broomsticks and warts are typical side effects.
Crow: Indicative of a superiority complex and an insufferably arrogant attitude. Permissible for any such person, male or female.
Roar: Particularly jocular males over the age of 40 frequently roar.
Whoop: A victory cry employed by young people under the age of 16.
|
|
Comments: Read 6 or Add Your Own.
|
|
Sunday, January 5th, 2003
|
|
|
Greetings, humble subjects. I would first like to extend my thanks to sirjake for coming up with this brilliant idea. If he wasn't already a knight, I would knight him. However, just because he had a good idea once does not give him leave to get puffed up over this. I am willing to give credit where credit is due, but neither am I hesitant to give criticism and reproof when necessary. So, watch your step, my boy. And that goes for the rest of you.
I am really quite fatigued so I shall retire for the evening. I do not know how often I will grace LiveJournal with my presence, but I will make an effort to compose another royal post on the morrow.
|
|
Comments: Read 25 or Add Your Own.
|
|
|
indifferent.